Pallas

Meta Ads account analysis

Understand the change. Decide what comes next.

1. Account and period summary

Account synthetic-meta-account2026-08-01 to 2026-08-28USD · America/Los_Angeles

Product: not yet verified · Current optimization goal: not yet verified.

Average cost per click increased from 0.87 to 0.95, a relative change of +8.67%.

Next: confirm the optimization event and business goal, then inspect changes and downstream quality in the main campaigns.

Spend
8,040.66
USD
Clicks
8,873
clicks
Average cost per click
0.91
USD
Click-through rate
2%
Clicks / impressions
All valid rows in the selected files were read; full account coverage has not been verified. Current goal settings are not historical settings. Click efficiency does not establish purchase performance or long-term returns. These are imported files, with no media API connection, and do not represent live account state. Only campaigns and dates in the files are included. Missing values are not filled with zero; click and conversion attribution need verification. Conversion event: unconfirmed. Attribution window: unconfirmed. Native conversions are not automatically purchases; see the source records CSV for the full record.

Observed spending: 2026-08-01 to 2026-08-28. Comparison scope: 2026-08-01 to 2026-08-28, as requested.

2. Changes and possible causes

Average cost per click increased from 0.87 to 0.95, a relative change of +8.67%.

Earlier: 2026-08-01 to 2026-08-14; later: 2026-08-15 to 2026-08-28. Equal-length periods; the middle day of an odd-length range is excluded.

CPM changes contributed +0.04 USD per click; CTR changes contributed +0.03 USD per click.

Arithmetic contributions to CPCUnit: USD per clickCPMCPMCPM: +0.04 USD per click+0.04CTRCTRCTR: +0.03 USD per click+0.03

Unit: USD per click

CPM
+0.04
CTR
+0.03
Positive values increase CPC; negative values offset the increase. Components use the same retained calculation. Unit: USD per click. Bars start at zero and show values directly.

This is an arithmetic decomposition, not proof of auction competition, creative fatigue or audience changes. Verify settings, creatives and conversion evidence for the same period.

Synthetic Prospecting represents 60.73% of the observed spend.

Check the goals and downstream quality of the main campaigns first. Spend concentration identifies where to look; it does not prove inefficiency.

Spend by leading campaignUnit: USDSynthetic ProspectingSynthetic ProspectingSynthetic Prospecting: 4,883.25 USD4,883.25Synthetic RetargetingSynthetic RetargetingSynthetic Retargeting: 1,908.73 USD1,908.73Synthetic Creative TestSynthetic Creative TestSynthetic Creative Test: 1,248.68 USD1,248.68

Unit: USD

Synthetic Prospecting
4,883.25
Synthetic Retargeting
1,908.73
Synthetic Creative Test
1,248.68
Up to five campaigns, ranked by spend. Other campaigns remain in the CSV; their omission here does not mean they are absent. Unit: USD. Bars start at zero and show values directly.

Among resolved campaigns, Synthetic Prospecting has the largest absolute net contribution to account CPC: within-campaign efficiency +0.04, click-share contribution +0 USD per click.

These are contributions to the account change, not changes in the campaign's own CPC. New, exited or zero-click groups may be unresolved. A zero share contribution does not establish unchanged budgets.

The highest observed daily spend was 315.41 USD on 2026-08-20.

Observed daily spendSpend (USD)0157.70315.412026-08-01: 304.16 USD2026-08-02: 303.57 USD2026-08-03: 271.44 USD2026-08-04: 284.46 USD2026-08-05: 290.27 USD2026-08-06: 283.75 USD2026-08-07: 304.97 USD2026-08-08: 282.80 USD2026-08-09: 292.87 USD2026-08-10: 281.40 USD2026-08-11: 273.87 USD2026-08-12: 280.04 USD2026-08-13: 276.43 USD2026-08-14: 260.47 USD2026-08-15: 288.10 USD2026-08-16: 297.57 USD2026-08-17: 290.30 USD2026-08-18: 274.17 USD2026-08-19: 277.80 USD2026-08-20: 315.41 USD2026-08-21: 282.39 USD2026-08-22: 275.71 USD2026-08-23: 276.02 USD2026-08-24: 280.20 USD2026-08-25: 297.31 USD2026-08-26: 302.20 USD2026-08-27: 294.39 USD2026-08-28: 298.59 USD2026-08-012026-08-082026-08-152026-08-222026-08-28
Observed daily spendSpend (USD)0157.70315.412026-08-01: 304.16 USD2026-08-02: 303.57 USD2026-08-03: 271.44 USD2026-08-04: 284.46 USD2026-08-05: 290.27 USD2026-08-06: 283.75 USD2026-08-07: 304.97 USD2026-08-08: 282.80 USD2026-08-09: 292.87 USD2026-08-10: 281.40 USD2026-08-11: 273.87 USD2026-08-12: 280.04 USD2026-08-13: 276.43 USD2026-08-14: 260.47 USD2026-08-15: 288.10 USD2026-08-16: 297.57 USD2026-08-17: 290.30 USD2026-08-18: 274.17 USD2026-08-19: 277.80 USD2026-08-20: 315.41 USD2026-08-21: 282.39 USD2026-08-22: 275.71 USD2026-08-23: 276.02 USD2026-08-24: 280.20 USD2026-08-25: 297.31 USD2026-08-26: 302.20 USD2026-08-27: 294.39 USD2026-08-28: 298.59 USD08-0108-1408-28

2026-08-01 to 2026-08-28; missing dates break the line.

Unit: USD. The x-axis follows actual date spacing. Missing dates break the line and are not filled with zero. All dates are retained in theDaily detail.

A peak is not necessarily an anomaly. No returned flags does not establish that screening ran or that the business is healthy. Screening requires at least 14 available days and a nonzero median absolute deviation.

Audience changes cannot yet be assessed: observed reach data is unavailable, and targeting settings cannot substitute for it.

Advertising and internal conversions: paid acquisition and organic growth

Using internal definitions, acquisition cost for new paid users attributed to this platform is 24.22 USD.

Internal conversion rate: paid 10.84%, organic 28.06% (descriptive difference, not causal).

Revenue per new user: paid 3.47, organic 9.66 (descriptive difference, not causal).

Retention rate: paid 16.27%, organic 37.53% (descriptive difference, not causal).

Shared period: 2026-08-01 to 2026-08-28, 28 days. Excluded unmatched days: advertising 0, internal 0. Internal definitions: first purchase; last non-direct click UTM; America/Los_Angeles; cohorts based on acquisition date.

Platform conversions are 14.72 times internal paid conversions. Do not add them together. Check event definitions, attribution windows and deduplication before attributing the discrepancy to either source.

Only paid data mapped to this platform is combined with ad spend for efficiency calculations. Unknown, unlabeled and excluded channels are not assigned to either group. Quality comparisons retain the original sample thresholds and are not significance tests. Concurrent organic growth does not prove advertising lift or cannibalization.

Campaigns match only by identical IDs. Unmatched internal IDs: 0; campaigns without internal records: 0; paid rows missing IDs: 0.

3. Findings and next steps

The evidence supports an order of investigation. Budget and delivery changes should wait until goal definitions and outcome quality are verified.

  1. Now · Confirm the evaluation criteria

    Verify the optimization event and business goal

    Confirm the product, event definitions, attribution window and applicable historical period before choosing success metrics.

  2. Next · Inspect the main changes

    Review downstream quality in the main campaigns

    For the campaigns and periods above, check conversion quality using the same event and observation window. Fill evidence gaps first; do not scale on CPC alone.

  3. First, align definitions

    Align platform events and internal conversion definitions

    Check events, attribution windows and deduplication rules, then confirm the business's evaluation criteria.

  4. Then verify

    Review paid and organic quality differences within matched cohorts

    Keep conversion definitions, acquisition dates and observation windows aligned. A descriptive difference in one period is not a basis for scaling.

These are verification suggestions; no ads were changed. Budgets, success thresholds and scaling conditions require business input.